Filter results

47672 results

Choose a delivery mode

<< Educational Advice Design Open menu Design foundations for education Construct a learning objective Choose a delivery mode Create a course structure Align the course assessment plan Need support? Get in touch with us! We are happy to help. Teaching-Support@tudelft.nl +31 (0)15 27 84 333 Anchor Links Example More contact details Choose a delivery mode The delivery mode of your course or learning activity makes a big difference for the way you teach. This page gives an overview of different modes supported at TU Delft. Why considering a delivery mode is important It is important to consider the delivery mode that fits your learning objectives, target audience, and activities best, so learning can happen effectively and you can make the most efficient use of the time available. Overview of available modes The following modes are supported at TU Delft: Mode Description Recommended for Face-to-face Both lecturer and students are physically present in the room. Interactive lectures, discussions, group work, practicals. Hybrid The lecturer is physically present in the classroom. Students are either physically present or are online. Lectures with limited interaction or demonstrations. Remote Both lecturer and students are online. Interactive lectures, online group work. Face-to-face Face-to-face education, where both lecturer and students are physically present in the classroom, is best used for interactive learning activities and as introductions for a course or groups of students, when building a relationship is especially important. Blended learning A specialised form of face-to-face education is blended learning, a deliberate, integrated combination of online and face-to-face learning activities . Reach out to the blended education adviser at your faculty for more information and hands-on advice. Hybrid With hybrid education students can join both in class and online. Hybrid education makes it possible to extend the number of students who can attend and allows for students to participate when they are unable to make it to campus. It is, however, very difficult to offer the same level of interaction to all students, especially in larger groups, as your focus will naturally be on the students who join in class. We therefore recommend having a dedicated moderator, like a colleague or teaching assistant, who interacts with the students online and makes sure questions are answered. Three modes of hybrid education are offered: Advanced : When you want to teach a synchronous lecture with light interaction. A moderator is a necessity. There are multiple education rooms that are fully designed for advanced hybrid education, supporting interaction with students in class and at home. You can find an overview of these rooms in the Education Spaces Viewer . Basic : When you want to teach a synchronous lecture with light interaction. A moderator is a recommended. You use a special device to turn your computer into a hybrid system. You are visible and audible for all students, but interaction is limited. Please note that the availability of hybrid devices is organised by the faculties. Live stream : When you want a synchronous lecture with little to no interaction, but do want to emphasise certain demonstrations during the lecture. The lecture is broadcast live over the internet with a slight delay. Remote When using remote education, both lecturer and students are online. Remote education works best for interactive lectures, online group work, or one-on-one conversations. TU Delft offers a wide range of remote teaching tools . Teaching fully remote Although we do not recommend doing so, circumstances might force you to teach fully remote, without face-to-face activities. In this case we can share the following tips: Limit remote teaching sessions : fully remote education is intense for both lecturer and student. Try to limit the duration of your teaching sessions and stick to the essentials. Student-paced activities, where students can watch a lecture or work on an activity at a time of their choosing, often works better than a real-time session. Provide clear instructions to students : what do you expect of students and how can they meet those expectations? Provide clear instructions to guide students in what to do and when. Add interactivity to your session : use a polling tool to ask questions, ask students to ask questions in the chat, or use breakout rooms so students can discuss in small groups. Create a pleasant online environment : open the session at least 10 minutes before it starts, mute all the participants at the beginning of your session, and be mindful of the privacy of students, especially when recording a lecture. Next step When you have picked a delivery mode for your course, creating a course structure would be the next step. How to get help Do you need help with choosing, or preparing for, a delivery mode? Reach out to the educational or blended advisors at your faculty or contact Teaching Support for one-on-one guidance. Need support? Get in touch with us! We are happy to help. Teaching-Support@tudelft.nl +31 (0)15 27 84 333 Anchor Links Example More contact details

Half Height Horizontal

New LDE trainee in D&I office

Keehan Akbari has started since the beginning of September as a new LDE trainee in the Diversity and Inclusion office. What motivated him to work for the D&I office, what does he expect to achieve during this traineeship? Read the short interview below! What motivated you to pursue your LDE traineeship in Diversity and Inclusion office of the TU Delft? I completed both bachelor's and master's degrees in Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology at Leiden University. Within these studies, my main area of interest was in themes of inclusion and diversity. After being hired as a trainee for the LDE traineeship, and discovering that one of the possible assignments belonged to the Diversity and Inclusion office, my choice was quickly made. I saw this as an excellent opportunity to put the theories I learned during my studies into practice. What specific skills or experiences do you bring to the D&I office that will help promote inclusivity on campus? I am someone who likes to connect rather than polarize, taking into account the importance of different perspectives and stakeholders. I believe that this is how one can achieve the most in fostering diversity and inclusion. You need to get multiple parties on board to get the best results. What are your main goals as you begin your role here, and how do you hope to make an impact? An important goal for me this year is to get students more involved in diversity and inclusion at the university. One way I will try to accomplish this is by contributing to the creation of D&I student teams. By establishing a D&I student team for faculties, it will be possible to deal with diversity- and inclusion-related issues that apply and relate to the specific department. How do you plan to engage with different (student) communities within the university? Since I am new to TU Delft, the first thing I need to do is expand my network here. Therefore, I am currently busy exploring the university and getting to know various stakeholders. Moreover, I intend to be in close contact with various student and study organizations to explore together how to strengthen cooperation on diversity and inclusion. Welcome to the team Keehan and we wish you lots of success with your traineeship!

Researchers from TU Delft and Cambridge University collaborate on innovative methods to combat Climate Change

For over a year and a half, researchers from TU Delft and the Cambridge University Centre for Climate Repair have worked together on groundbreaking techniques to increase the reflectivity of clouds in the fight against global warming. During a two-day meeting, the teams are discussing their progress. Researchers at Cambridge are focusing on the technical development of a system that can spray seawater, releasing tiny salt crystals into the atmosphere to brighten the clouds. The team from TU Delft, led by Prof. Dr. Ir. Herman Russchenberg, scientific director of the TU Delft Climate Action Program and professor of Atmospheric Remote Sensing, is studying the physical effects of this technique. Prof. Russchenberg emphasizes the importance of this research: "We have now taken the first steps towards developing emergency measures against climate change. If it proves necessary, we must be prepared to implement these techniques. Ideally, we wouldn't need to use them, but it's important to investigate how they work now." Prof. Dr. Ir. Stefan Aarninkhof, dean of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, expresses pride in the team as the first results of this unique collaboration are becoming visible. If the researchers in Delft and Cambridge can demonstrate the potential of the concept, the first small-scale experiments will responsibly begin within a year. This research has been made possible thanks to the long-term support from the Refreeze the Arctic Foundation, founded by family of TU Delft alumnus Marc Salzer Levi . Such generous contributions enable innovative and high-impact research that addresses urgent global challenges like climate change. Large donations like these enable the pursuit of innovative, high-impact research that may not otherwise be feasible, demonstrating how our collective effort and investment in science can lead to real, transformative solutions for global challenges like climate change. Climate-Action Programme

How system safety can make Machine Learning systems safer in the public sector

Machine Learning (ML), a form of AI where patterns are discovered in large amounts of data, can be very useful. It is increasingly used, for example, in chatbot Chat GPT, facial recognition, or speech software. However, there are also concerns about the use of ML systems in the public sector. How do you prevent the system from, for example, discriminating or making large-scale mistakes with negative effects on citizens? Scientists at TU Delft, including Jeroen Delfos, investigated how lessons from system safety can contribute to making ML systems safer in the public sector. “Policymakers are busy devising measures to counter the negative effects of ML. Our research shows that they can rely much more on existing concepts and theories that have already proven their value in other sectors,” says Jeroen Delfos. Jeroen Delfos Learning from other sectors In their research, the scientists used concepts from system safety and systems theory to describe the challenges of using ML systems in the public sector. Delfos: “Concepts and tools from the system safety literature are already widely used to support safety in sectors such as aviation, for example by analysing accidents with system safety methods. However, this is not yet common practice in the field of AI and ML. By applying a system-theoretical perspective, we view safety not only as a result of how the technology works, but as the result of a complex set of technical, social, and organisational factors.” The researchers interviewed professionals from the public sector to see which factors are recognized and which are still underexposed. Bias There is room for improvement to make ML systems in the public sector safer. For example, bias in data is still often seen as a technical problem, while the origin of that bias may lie far outside the technical system. Delfos: “Consider, for instance, the registration of crime. In neighbourhoods where the police patrol more frequently, logically, more crime is recorded, which leads to these areas being overrepresented in crime statistics. An ML system trained to discover patterns in these statistics will replicate or even reinforce this bias. However, the problem lies in the method of recording, not in the ML system itself.” Reducing risks According to the researchers, policymakers and civil servants involved in the development of ML systems would do well to incorporate system safety concepts. For example, it is advisable to identify in advance what kinds of accidents one wants to prevent when designing an ML system. Another lesson from system safety, for instance in aviation, is that systems tend to become more risky over time in practice, because safety becomes subordinate to efficiency as long as no accidents occur. “It is therefore important that safety remains a recurring topic in evaluations and that safety requirements are enforced,” says Delfos. Read the research paper .